M.L.E. An acronym that has been floated around for awhile in the twittersphere, perhaps due to it being filled with early adopters and future focused teachers. M.L.E - or Modern Learning Environments, is a new acronym to my colleagues and one that has caused quite a lot of confusion and chaos in our preparation for upcoming changes to our school building.
My understanding is that the Ministry of Education has decided that current school buildings in New Zealand do not all meet the needs of today's learning. They are requiring all schools to move towards being an MLE.
Shiny shiny new things...
These new spaces appeal to most magpies because of the infinite possibilities for new furniture, better ventilation, heating, lighting and soundproofing and good storage. However re-creating the open plan learning spaces of the 1970's falls short of future planning. Suddenly there is an expectation that we will all be team-teaching.
Now I for one am not against team teaching. I used to be a Kindergarten teacher and I worked very closely and very collaboratively with my team. It's not a new thing, and it's not an impossible thing, I'm just not sure it's the right thing for everybody.
Recently on a trip around some new school builds a teacher reflected quite honestly and openly with me about the lack of flexibility of sharing a space. She said she was working 12 hour days as they needed to meet every day after school, that she couldn't just take the students out for a game because it had a knock-on effect, and that she was really worried about one of the beginning teachers as the demands were so high.
I took her reflection and reflected on my own values and beliefs. I value autonomy and flexibility. I want to be able to stop a lesson because it's not the right time/space/place and go do something else. I want to innovate and mix things up and build really strong relationships with a class of children.
One of the designs presented to us as part of our consultation is based on a singular cell with a collaborative space right outside. I think this would be a far more beneficial step towards collaboration as it allows autonomy and the ability to connect. I think moving towards open plan is too far away from people's comfort zones.
The biggest thing that I am scared of is working with others. Hey wait a sec! Didn't you just say you worked collaboratively as a Kindergarten teacher?? Ah yes I did. And I spent a lot of time picking the right team to work with. I was very selective in which team I wanted to work in.
Existing staff who are used to working in single cell classrooms will struggle with collaboration. A Principal will struggle to find teams that will gel together and fit within existing school structures. If I were in the position to decide how team teaching would look then I would be looking at finding partners who established what team teaching looked like for them. I also wouldn't have everybody using the same model. Juniors have different learning needs from seniors and so forth. I would also trial things - make nothing permanent. Another aspect that annoys me is grouping of students. My school currently uses a Year 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8 model. I'd like to see some flexibility in that. I'd love to mix it up especially since so many of my Y4 students were already working in Level 3 last year.
But I am one person. I am an early adopter. A future focused teacher who makes things happen for myself. I am in touch with what happens beyond my four walls. I am an easy person to convince to try something new. So how about my colleagues?
Please note I am not against team teaching in open plan. I am somewhat jealous of schools that are able to hand pick their teachers and be innovative in what they are doing. But there is a spectrum here and it is all relatively new. Nobody in those environments are saying that they are perfect either but I do admire their open reflections and allowing others like myself to come and have a look.
“Hinengaro refers to the mental, intuitive and ‘feeling’ seat of the emotions. Thinking, knowing, perceiving, remembering, recognizing, feeling, abstracting, generalizing, sensing, responding and reacting are all processes of the Hinengaro – the mind.” Rose Pere (1981). Teaching involves the heart and the mind. These are some of my musings.
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Monday, March 23, 2015
Passion versus Curiosity
"If you don't have an obvious passion, forget about it. Follow your curiosity because passion is somewhat a tower of flame that is not always accessible. And curiosity is something anybody can access any day. Your curiosity may lead you to your passion or it may not. It may have been for "nothing" and in that case all you have done is spend your existence in pursuit of the things that made you feel curious and inspired and that should be good enough. Like if you get to do that then that is a wonderful way to have spent your time here"
- Elizabeth Gilbert, Author
as cited on NPR's TED Radio episode "The source of Creativity"
These words from Elizabeth (author of Eat, Pray, Love), really confronted me as I am a person who is very passionate about what I do. I always viewed passion as being accessible and that it was up to intrinsic motivation to make it happen. But perhaps not everybody has to have a passion.
Curiosity, it seems is a far broader and more encompassing disposition needed for learning. Curiosity does not bond itself to one subject or area of expertise. Perhaps I need to rephrase some of my own "passions". I have always wondered if I perhaps had too many passions. I am interested in so many things. I know now that I have many curiosities and things that inspire me. Here are a few:
This thinking links with my thoughts about science teaching:
An area which I want to push curiosity in for next term.
- Elizabeth Gilbert, Author
as cited on NPR's TED Radio episode "The source of Creativity"
These words from Elizabeth (author of Eat, Pray, Love), really confronted me as I am a person who is very passionate about what I do. I always viewed passion as being accessible and that it was up to intrinsic motivation to make it happen. But perhaps not everybody has to have a passion.
Curiosity, it seems is a far broader and more encompassing disposition needed for learning. Curiosity does not bond itself to one subject or area of expertise. Perhaps I need to rephrase some of my own "passions". I have always wondered if I perhaps had too many passions. I am interested in so many things. I know now that I have many curiosities and things that inspire me. Here are a few:
- native birds
- books
- reading
- native plants
- crafts
- e-learning
- football
- rugby league
- gardening
- zumba
- tea
- social justice
- politics
- teaching
- networking
- te reo Maori
- kapa haka
and the list goes on...
Sometimes I wish that I had just one or two that I could commit all of my time too but I am far too curious for that!
So back to my students... do I want them to be passionate or curious? I think perhaps curious because it allows for change and the ability to try lots of things. I, as the teacher am providing a smorgasbord of possibilities. Some will seem more appetising than others. Some students will only want a taste while others will want a second helping. It's up to me to present those possibilities in a way that hooks my learner to want to try it.
![]() |
Hmm... which one will I try? |
This thinking links with my thoughts about science teaching:
#scichatnz should we be doing hands on exploration without an inquiry in primary? Do we need an inquiry? #somethoughtstoponder
— Leanne Stubbing (@fivefoot3) March 10, 2015
@MissDtheTeacher Play is the key to learning. Play is engaging, motivating and builds curiosity
— Dianne Christenson (@ChristensonDi) March 10, 2015
An area which I want to push curiosity in for next term.
Monday, March 16, 2015
Human Robots
Today I tried something a little different in my Makerspace session. Kids faces when I said we wouldn't be using the iPads for coding today:
What? Coding without iPads. NO WAY!!!
I used a lesson from Kodable that looked at programming human robots. That is, writing code for somebody else to follow to do an obstacle course. This also turned into a dance. This also turned into Miss Stubbing doing box jumps onto chairs and press ups. I actually think the kids were starting to take the mickey!!!!
I really enjoyed what happened in this lesson because the learning was both kinaesthetic and visual. Kids were jumping around all over the place. I was jumping all over the place. Students tested their code on me and on each other. And sometimes the code did not work!!!
At one point I was in a "doing the splits" position and supposed to be moving into jumping onto a chair. IMPOSSIBLE!!! The code needed to be changed. Try, change, try, change...
And just another reason why I am so keen on coding with students. Amazing problem-solving skills and hands on learning. And we didn't even use technology!!!
P.S. Afterwards one student said to me "I'd love to make real robots". Ah guess what kid? YOU CAN!! Hooked!
What? Coding without iPads. NO WAY!!!
I used a lesson from Kodable that looked at programming human robots. That is, writing code for somebody else to follow to do an obstacle course. This also turned into a dance. This also turned into Miss Stubbing doing box jumps onto chairs and press ups. I actually think the kids were starting to take the mickey!!!!
I really enjoyed what happened in this lesson because the learning was both kinaesthetic and visual. Kids were jumping around all over the place. I was jumping all over the place. Students tested their code on me and on each other. And sometimes the code did not work!!!
At one point I was in a "doing the splits" position and supposed to be moving into jumping onto a chair. IMPOSSIBLE!!! The code needed to be changed. Try, change, try, change...
![]() |
Me going from the splits into a jump |
And just another reason why I am so keen on coding with students. Amazing problem-solving skills and hands on learning. And we didn't even use technology!!!
P.S. Afterwards one student said to me "I'd love to make real robots". Ah guess what kid? YOU CAN!! Hooked!
Saturday, February 28, 2015
#educampwelly
Oh wow. I am still on such an amazing high after today's Educamp Wellington.
In October last year at ULearn, a few interested educators from Wellington got together informally to discuss making a more formalised connection. From this WellyEd was born. In November we had our first meeting and decided to host an Educamp. We discussed the essence of what an Educamp was (free flowing, knowledge in the room, people connecting, discussions) and built our ideas on that. We spent the next few months planning and promoting the event proving that not only is it great to have a big team of people helping out but collaborating together is special all in itself. Today all that hard work paid off.
Full house here for #educampwelly pic.twitter.com/d7qspvwrgb
— Jess Weichler (@jlweich) February 27, 2015
To be honest it is always a bit nerve-wrecking when you are hosting an event. Especially one that has nothing planned! The Smackdown was a great way to start firing up some ideas.
#educampwelly coming together! pic.twitter.com/DCwpxyM8Sb
— Welly ED (@Welly_ED) February 27, 2015
And then it was systems all go!
The sessions that I attended were:
- Solo Taxonomy (lead by the wonderful +Sonya Van Schaijik)
- Minecraft (where +Steve Katene shared lots of his knowledge)
- Genius Hour (where I lead the discussion)
- Design Thinking (where I made +Matt Ives share all his knowledge)
Then we all shared some kai together thanks for Network 4 Learning (thanks +Tim Kong) and then hit the pub! The learning just never stops happening. All those informal conversations you have with people are so valuable.
My takeaway things to go and implement from today are:
- To start using Solo Taxonomy in my class (thanks +Sonya Van Schaijik)
- To hunt down "Notebook How To" the book suggested by +Tara Taylor-Jorgensen about slowing down writing
- To access the crowdsourced documents that +Anne Kenneally has collated and that @jackbillie35 shared.
- Add a creative commons to my blog (thanks +Diana-Grace Morris)
- Watching some stuff on Cell Storming (thanks +Matt Ives) and make myself some hexagons, laminated of course (thanks +Paula Hay)
- Read all the links that people have shared with me.
- Confirm a date for the WellyEd end of term drinks with my co-conspirator +Rebbecca Sweeney
- Organise a Maker Party for my class with Jess Weichler
- Start planning a road trip to #educampHB to see +Juliet Revell
Woah a big list I know but hey it's good to keep the energy and the connections going.
Thanks to everyone that attended today and shared their knowledge. Still the best professional development that money can't buy (because it's free!)
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Is writing a neglected art?
![]() |
Stephanie may have lived in a Full House but she still made time for writing |
I have just finished 2 evenings of 3 way learning conferences for school. There was a similar theme that occurred when I asked the following question:
"Do you do any writing at home?"
"No"
I suddenly started feeling really sorry for writing. Poor neglected writing. Completely overshadowed by basic facts and spelling, sports practice, jazz ballet, swimming lessons and reading. And then I began to think about my own experience of doing this 28 days of writing challenge. It actually took me a few days to get into the flow of writing. Once I had flow it became easier. Then I ran out of ideas and got writers block. Then I found inspiration again and now I am back in flow.
Maybe my students who struggle with ideas and writing longer stories are actually struggling with finding flow? And maybe flow can only be found through actually writing regularly?
The way I engaged my struggling and reluctant writers last year was through free writing opportunities. They loved free writing. They wrote with buddies, created all types of written work and got really creative. Already this year with a new bunch of students they are asking for more opportunities for free writing. I am worried however that they only see their creativity being in this time.
So my questions to think about is how do I encourage writing as much as I do reading (which is my passion)? How do I get my students excited about teacher directed writing tasks as much as they do their own self-driven writing? How do I encourage them to write at home?
I have a few ideas... I want to utilise the blog as a way to promote audience. I want writing to be published and shared often. I want to utilise technology to provide other ways to create writing. I am also keen to introduce something similar to #28daysofwriting for my students to help them get into their flow.
I am always open to ideas so please feel to share some with me.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
You can bring a horse to water but you can't make it drink
For me Twitter is an amazing resource. I have been using it for several years now to connect with other teachers, connect with new ideas, collect resources and get my thoughts out there. Sometimes I feel a bit sorry for people who are not on Twitter. They are missing out on so much. I've tried to introduce a colleague before but without much luck.
Tonight I was listening to an EduAllstars podcast with Pernille Ripp as the educator being interviewed. Pernille responded to a question by the host about using social media like twitter. She said
"social media is a journey you have to take on your own"
Yes! Yes! Yes! We have these conversations as connected educators about getting more people connected but actually they kind of have to do it on their own. They have to have the drive to make things happen for themselves.
My use of Twitter is the reason why I am the e-learning leader at my school. Nobody told me I had to go on twitter or that I had to find my own professional learning network. I believe my life is richer for it. And certainly my connectedness with what is happening in education at the moment is on the pulse. I want to inspire others to be interested in e-learning and to make connections but I certainly can't force them.
I also feel this way about Educamps. Can you actually make somebody attend non-compulsory professional development? Will they really want to be there? Will they be able to contribute if they don't want to be there in the first place?
Connectedness is about being open. Open to new ideas and new connections. And to tell the truth I am ok about that circle of people I am connected to being small. Although when I say small I am technically connected to hundreds of educators. I am also ok about nobody from my school going to the educamp. Of course I'd love them to come and they would be so much richer for it but it has to come from their own drive.
You can lead a horse to the educamp information but you can't make them attend.
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Best Practice in Science
Slug on my garage wall - fascinating up close! |
Tonight I took part in #scichatnz on Twitter. The discussion was around best practice in Science. I always find these chats really worthwhile. They help me reaffirm my thoughts about the curriculum especially when I am unsure if I am looking at it from the right perspective.
I am a big lover of science. Biology would be my area of most enjoyment. Plants, nature oh and birds! I love native birds! I have a membership to Zealandia and I've also joined #birdclub to join up with some other ornithological minded people. I am always fascinated by my world around me.
My catchphrase in the classroom is "Science is everywhere". Because it is. It is growing, breathing, changing, developing and occurring around us constantly. It is not something that is hidden - it likes to show you all its magic tricks.
We can all be scientists because we can use our senses to observe. We can listen and look and feel and experience science happening. It doesn't matter if you are a researcher in a laboratory or a 7yr old in a classroom, the same principles apply.
One of my favourite places to get science information is on Twitter. @Runningwhio runs #SCIENTSSaturday and tweets about some amazingly interesting stuff.
They don’t bother disguising their eggs & will foist their eggs on just about any other bird species pic.twitter.com/S4Zyk0MS9p
— runningwhio (@runningwhio) February 22, 2015
I also enjoy RadioNZ podcasts "The World Around Us", The Moth Science podcasts, David Attenborough TV programmes and Masterchef.Yes Masterchef! Science at its best! Cooking is great science.
I also learn a lot off my students who seem to be fact-finding machines at age 7 and 8. Today a student told me an interesting fact about the planet Titon in regards to us reading an article about glow in the dark ice-cream. The kids always get books with facts in them out of the library. A book titled "Pestilence and Plague" is a favourite at the moment.
So best practice to me is about engaging students with the real world, with real people (can't wait for the chemistry lecturer parent who is coming in next term to make potions), and with real events. Let them lead with what knowledge they want to find out and most of all have hands on fun! Learning is doing!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)