“Hinengaro refers to the mental, intuitive and ‘feeling’ seat of the emotions. Thinking, knowing, perceiving, remembering, recognizing, feeling, abstracting, generalizing, sensing, responding and reacting are all processes of the Hinengaro – the mind.” Rose Pere (1981). Teaching involves the heart and the mind. These are some of my musings.
Showing posts with label social science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social science. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
The Pink Debate
The introduction of Pink Shirt Day evoked some interesting comments and expressions from the classroom.
"Boys can't wear pink!" "Yes they can!"
I decided that everybody needed to hear each others voices in this debate.
Students had time to discuss their thoughts with a peer then an invisible continuum was constructed across the room to show that there were two extreme arguments (and everything in between).
Students decided which side that they felt more strongly aligned to and also had the choice to stand somewhere in the middle. One student chose to stand on his own, swaying slightly towards the anti-pink agenda.
Each student was allowed to say one sentence to argue why boys should or should not wear pink, in the hope that they could sway the person in the middle.
The anti-pink team started first. All 6 of them had very valid arguments as to why they felt the way that they did. As a teacher, and an informed adult, it was easy to see the influence of marketing and stereotypes had shaped these young people's minds.
The pro-pink team consisted of both girls and boys. Their comments were absolutely phenomenal.
"There is no such thing as boys and girls colours."
"Everybody should be able to choose to wear whatever they want to."
"If you can't choose what to wear, how can you ever feel free?"
These are only a few examples. Our lone fence sitter chose to go towards the pro-pink end. I also gave the option to the anti-pink debaters to change which end they were at too. They all took a few steps towards the others (all except one who was standing his ground about a totally different issue - that he should have to go purchase a pink shirt).
Our whole class discussion then stemmed into stereotypes, and into marketing. I used Lego to get them talking. We discussed the difference between Lego Friends (pink girls Lego) and general Lego. The keen female Lego enthusiasts were horrified to think that they were supposed to only play with Lego that was pink. As one of them valiantly replied "I play with Lego because I like to create!". We also discussed the lack of female characters in Lego including what sort of roles the existing ones had.
This discussion was completely impromptu. It came from me telling the kids that it would be cool to support Pink Shirt Day and it's anti-bullying agenda. But this for me is an example of engaged learning. The discussion was very powerful, it came from the children and provided a framework for discussing a range of societal issues. I had a student teacher observing me at the time and I wish I had taken a picture of our faces as the debate evolved. We were just blown away!
I am helping to create a classroom of thinkers that don't accept things at face value. They are willing to challenge each other and each others ideas.
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
Literacy and Social Sciences
I went on a course today about how to integrate literacy and social science.
Integration has always seemed logical to me. Perhaps because in Early Childhood there is no splitting up on subjects. Learning just happens.
When we teach a subject in isolation learning becomes fragmented. In life, we don't compartmentalise our experiences, so why should we do this in teaching?
Reading and writing naturally go with social science. We read information, we use writing to show our ideas. The most important thing that I learnt at this course was the importance of oral language to help support thinking and understanding.
Teaching strategies such as "think-pair-share" and "jigsaw" all help students pull apart ideas and use their prior knowledge. Through this dialogue, thinking is shaped.
When it comes to writing a response, students are already at a more polished stage of understanding and have confidence in their thinking.
The other integral part of this is using structure to help students write their ideas. Writing frames provide one level of support and this can be differentiated to meet the needs of the students in the class. Some may need a lot of support and others may know exactly what they are going to write.
And back to the purpose of social science..
'The social sciences learning area is about how societies work and how people can participate as critical, active, informed, and responsible citizens.' (The New Zealand Curriculum, 2007)
to be able to do this we need to be able to talk to each other, think critically about texts and write responses that reflect our thoughts.
Integration has always seemed logical to me. Perhaps because in Early Childhood there is no splitting up on subjects. Learning just happens.
When we teach a subject in isolation learning becomes fragmented. In life, we don't compartmentalise our experiences, so why should we do this in teaching?
Reading and writing naturally go with social science. We read information, we use writing to show our ideas. The most important thing that I learnt at this course was the importance of oral language to help support thinking and understanding.
Teaching strategies such as "think-pair-share" and "jigsaw" all help students pull apart ideas and use their prior knowledge. Through this dialogue, thinking is shaped.
When it comes to writing a response, students are already at a more polished stage of understanding and have confidence in their thinking.
The other integral part of this is using structure to help students write their ideas. Writing frames provide one level of support and this can be differentiated to meet the needs of the students in the class. Some may need a lot of support and others may know exactly what they are going to write.
And back to the purpose of social science..
'The social sciences learning area is about how societies work and how people can participate as critical, active, informed, and responsible citizens.' (The New Zealand Curriculum, 2007)
to be able to do this we need to be able to talk to each other, think critically about texts and write responses that reflect our thoughts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

